Mobile Comparisons For You
Compare From
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Vivo Pad SE
Vivo Pad SE

RS 59,999

Compare With
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Xiaomi 16 Pro
Xiaomi 16 Pro

RS 389,999

Display
Display Type
IPS LCD
LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (typ), 3000 nits (peak)
Dimensions
N/A
N/A
Resolution
1200 x 1920 pixels
1220 x 2712 Pixels
Weight
N/A
N/A
Colors
Titanium, Blue, DarkGray
Black; other colors
Size
12.25 inches
6.85 inches
Protection
Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)
Unspecified
Extra Features
120Hz, HDR10+
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
-
Memory
Card slot
MicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
MicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
RAM
6 GB RAM, 8 GB RAM
12 GB RAM
Storage
128GB, 256GBBuilt-in
256 Built-in
Camera
Front Camera
5 MP Single
32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
Features
LED flash, HDR, panorama
Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional)
Back Camera
8 MP Single
50 MP, f/1.6-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
Network
2G Network
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Network
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G Network
LTE
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900)
5G Networks
SA/NSA
Yes
OS
OS
Android 15
Android 15, HyperOS 2
UI
FuntouchOS 14
Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm)
Octa-core
CPU
Octa-core
-
Battery
Battery Type
Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh
(Non removable) 5500 mAh
Fast Charging
Fast charging 44W
80W wireless
Connectivity
Wi-fi Hotspot
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth
5.4 with A2DP, LE
V5.4 with A2DP, LE
USB
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
USB Type-C 2.0
Price
Price in Pak
59,999
389,999
Disclaimer: We can not guarantee that all the details regarding this comparison is 100% correct.